<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapNames Lowering Reserve Price?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/</link>
	<description>..domainer news, musings, and odd ramblings</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dominik Mueller</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Mueller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I think they might have lowered the reserve to $59, because they wanted the regular drop auctions to look more like their new Seller Program auctions, which usually have reserve prices of $79, $99 etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they might have lowered the reserve to $59, because they wanted the regular drop auctions to look more like their new Seller Program auctions, which usually have reserve prices of $79, $99 etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 16:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Is going from $60 to $59 of any real significance?

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is going from $60 to $59 of any real significance?</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calder</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Calder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/snapnames-lowering-reserve-price/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is true - we are gradually moving away from a flat $60 and will start presenting a range  of prices more representative of value.  Moving from $60 down to $59 was one of the first steps. Customers can expect to see more variable prices,  especially as more names being sold through the SnapNames Seller Program flow into auctions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is true - we are gradually moving away from a flat $60 and will start presenting a range  of prices more representative of value.  Moving from $60 down to $59 was one of the first steps. Customers can expect to see more variable prices,  especially as more names being sold through the SnapNames Seller Program flow into auctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
