<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Good &#038; Bad of Using NameJet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/</link>
	<description>..domainer news, musings, and odd ramblings</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 16:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DomainerPro</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>DomainerPro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>"some domains have a minimum bid of $1K cause they’ve been bid up from $70 during the pre-release period.."

Right, I realize that now. I have won a few domains through NameJet now and I find the management process to be fairly simple. So that's another plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;some domains have a minimum bid of $1K cause they’ve been bid up from $70 during the pre-release period..&#8221;</p>
<p>Right, I realize that now. I have won a few domains through NameJet now and I find the management process to be fairly simple. So that&#8217;s another plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>NamJet doesn't have Paypal, snap has it. I sent in a request a few weeks ago and they have not yet implemented it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NamJet doesn&#8217;t have Paypal, snap has it. I sent in a request a few weeks ago and they have not yet implemented it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Askew</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2665</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Askew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 22:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2665</guid>
		<description>some domains have a minimum bid of $1K cause they've been bid up from $70 during the pre-release period..

-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some domains have a minimum bid of $1K cause they&#8217;ve been bid up from $70 during the pre-release period..</p>
<p>-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN Sales Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>DN Sales Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Nice piece Peter I put it a link to it on www.dnsalesblog.com.  Is it true some domains have a minumum starting bid of $1000 ? 

Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece Peter I put it a link to it on <a href="http://www.dnsalesblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnsalesblog.com</a>.  Is it true some domains have a minumum starting bid of $1000 ? </p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domain name newbie</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2630</link>
		<dc:creator>domain name newbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2630</guid>
		<description>I just read DomainerPro.com comments and quick review on NameJet and I would like to share it here too.
Pros:
*I like the fact that on their home page they feature some of the premium pre-release and  deleting domains, and some of the auctions that are closing soon. At this moment in the Pre-Release box I see loansdirect.com, freshwater.com and paycenter.com, all of which are great names. I’m curious to see what sort of bids they will fetch. 
*I can add domains to a “Watch List” without actually bidding on them (though I don’t see any way to remove them). 
*There are 81 dot com names at auction right now and most have received few or no bids, perhaps because NameJet is not well known yet. This might be a good opportunity to get some expiring domains at good prices. 
Cons:

*The site is still buggy. I tried three times to back order a Pending Delete name and got the message “No data returned.” Some other functions are buggy as well. 
*Premium domains have higher starting bids. I notice that the minimum bids for loansdirect.com and freshwater.com are $1,000. 
*Minimum bid for backorders is $70 - that’s $10 more than Snapnames. 
*Because most of these names are dropping from Network Solutions, if you win an auction your domain goes into a Network Solutions account; they offer great service and features, but they are one of the more expensive registrars, charging $30 a year for a .com registration. 
*The domains at auction right now are mostly gambling names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read DomainerPro.com comments and quick review on NameJet and I would like to share it here too.<br />
Pros:<br />
*I like the fact that on their home page they feature some of the premium pre-release and  deleting domains, and some of the auctions that are closing soon. At this moment in the Pre-Release box I see loansdirect.com, freshwater.com and paycenter.com, all of which are great names. I’m curious to see what sort of bids they will fetch.<br />
*I can add domains to a “Watch List” without actually bidding on them (though I don’t see any way to remove them).<br />
*There are 81 dot com names at auction right now and most have received few or no bids, perhaps because NameJet is not well known yet. This might be a good opportunity to get some expiring domains at good prices.<br />
Cons:</p>
<p>*The site is still buggy. I tried three times to back order a Pending Delete name and got the message “No data returned.” Some other functions are buggy as well.<br />
*Premium domains have higher starting bids. I notice that the minimum bids for loansdirect.com and freshwater.com are $1,000.<br />
*Minimum bid for backorders is $70 - that’s $10 more than Snapnames.<br />
*Because most of these names are dropping from Network Solutions, if you win an auction your domain goes into a Network Solutions account; they offer great service and features, but they are one of the more expensive registrars, charging $30 a year for a .com registration.<br />
*The domains at auction right now are mostly gambling names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.domainersgazette.com/the-good-bad-of-using-namejet/#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the breakdown of pros and cons Peter. Seems like a good system, although the required wire transfers over $5,000 could be a problem imo. I agree with you on preferring  to to track  business expenses on my credit card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the breakdown of pros and cons Peter. Seems like a good system, although the required wire transfers over $5,000 could be a problem imo. I agree with you on preferring  to to track  business expenses on my credit card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
